Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Fair Value Measurements

v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements  
NOTE 4 - Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows the principles of fair value accounting as they relate to its financial assets and financial liabilities. Fair value is defined as the estimated exit price received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, rather than an entry price that represents the purchase price of an asset or liability.  Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters, or derived from such prices or parameters.  Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied.  These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on several factors, including the instrument’s complexity.  The required fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels is described as follows:

 

Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

 

Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs (i.e., inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in estimating the fair value of an asset or liability) are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

 

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific financial instrument, then the Company estimates fair value by using pricing models, quoted prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to valuation, financial assets or liabilities are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy.

 

The Company does not use derivative instruments for hedging of market risks or for trading or speculative purposes. In conjunction with the issuance of the Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes and related Exchange Warrant and Investment Warrants to Platinum in October 2012, February 2013, March 2013, and the potential issuance of the Series A Exchange Warrant (see Note 9, Capital Stock), all pursuant to the Note Exchange and Purchase Agreement of October 2012 between the Company and Platinum (see Note 7, Convertible Promissory Notes and Other Notes Payable), and the issuance of the warrant related to the Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note issued to Platinum in July 2013, the Company determined that the warrants included certain exercise price adjustment features requiring the warrants to be treated as liabilities, which were recorded at their estimated fair value. The Company determined the initial fair value of the warrant liability using a Monte Carlo simulation model with Level 3 inputs or the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model. Inputs used to determine fair value include the remaining contractual term of the warrants, risk-free interest rates, expected volatility of the price of the underlying common stock, and the probability of a financing transaction that would trigger a reset in the warrant exercise price, and, in the case of the Series A Exchange Warrant, the probability of Platinum’s exchange of the shares of Series A Preferred it holds into shares of common stock. Changes in the fair value of these warrant liabilities since March 31, 2013 have been recognized as non-cash component of other expense, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2013.

 

 The fair value hierarchy for the warrant liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis is as follows:

 

          Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  
          Quoted Prices              
          in Active     Significant        
          Markets for     Other     Significant  
    Total     Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
    Carrying     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
    Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
September 30, 2013:                        
 Warrant liability   $ 4,657,300     $ -     $ -     $ 4,657,300  
March 31, 2013:                                
 Warrant liability   $ 6,394,000     $ -     $ -     $ 6,394,000  

 

 During the six month period ended September 30, 2013, there was no significant change to the valuation models used for purposes of determining the fair value of the Level 3 warrant liability.  The decline in the market price of the Company’s common stock since March 31, 2013 and the reduction in the exercise price of the warrants as described in Note 9, Capital Stock, are the primary factors resulting in the reduction in the warrant liability.

 

 The changes in Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

    Fair Value Measurements  
    Using Significant  
    Unobservable Inputs  
    (Level 3)  
    Warrant Liability  
       
Balance at March 31, 2013   $ 6,394,000  
         
Recognition of warrant liability upon issuance of Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note to Platinum on July 26, 2013     146,800  
Mark to market gain included in net loss     (1,883,500 )
Balance at September 30, 2013   $ 4,657,300  

 

     No assets or other liabilities were carried at fair value at September 30, 2013 or March 31, 2013.